Naturally, Justice Anthony Scalia, the court's most cantankerous conservative, had the bitchiest argument, railing against his fellow judges for what he felt was their bypassing of the democratic process and writing their own law. And he opposed striking down states' bans on same-sex marriage. I totally dismiss the religious arguments against same-sex marriage, since marriage is no longer a predominantly religious issue: it has evolved over the years.
Trans Activist Aimee Stephens Dies at
Get all the day's most vital news with our Today's Headlines newsletter, sent every weekday morning. Only one hails from the vast expanse in-between. First off, let me confess that I have never really fully understood homosexuality.
It often indicates a user profile. Fundamentally, Scalia's conservatism rested on one idea: The US Constitution is more constrained than his more liberal colleagues would suggest — and trying to interpret the Constitution loosely will allow the Court to strike down legitimate laws and, in the end, undermine democracy.
Trans Activist Aimee Stephens Dies at Jacobs at sam. Nobody ever thought the Constitution prevented scalia comments on same sex marriage in Leonora on abortion. He argued that the Court had empowered itself to effectively overturn democracy at its will.
Scalia's stance on gay rights demonstrated his originalist view: He believed the Constitution couldn't protect gay rights, because no one could envision, for example, same-sex marriage as an issue back when the Constitution and its amendments were written.
Only one hails from the vast expanse in-between. This differs from some of the more liberal justices on the Court, who take a more fluid interpretation of the Constitution. This intimidates too many folks; thus they shy-away from the topic.
It had nothing to do with it. Get The Brief.